SPRINGFIELD, Ill. — Illinois lawmakers took a significant step forward this week in their effort to keep the Chicago Bears in the state, as House Bill 910 advanced in committee. The bill, which aims to incentivize the team to stay in Illinois, sparked intense debate over whether the measure would protect or burden taxpayers.
According to WCIA, the discussion comes as Indiana lawmakers move aggressively to lure the Bears across the state line. The Illinois bill would create a framework for potential stadium deals and tax incentives to keep the team in Chicago. However, some lawmakers expressed concerns about the long-term financial implications of the proposal.
One of the most contentious aspects of the bill is its provision to freeze property taxes for nearly half a century in areas where major developments like a new stadium are proposed. Representative Rita Mayfield (D-Waukegan) called this provision “absolutely ridiculous,” stating that it places an unfair burden on taxpayers.
“I can’t see anyone voting for that,” Mayfield said. “It’s just not plausible. When you’re looking at other districts such as mine, I would love a $200 billion project, but not on the backs of my taxpayers.”
The bill would also require “Mega Projects” to invest at least $250 million and create 50 permanent full-time jobs, or invest $100 million and create 100 permanent full-time jobs. These provisions are designed to ensure that any development brings substantial economic benefits to the state.
Chicago’s acting Chief Financial Officer Steven Mahr testified before the committee, stating that the city wants to keep the Bears but is seeking a “fair and equitable” opportunity in negotiations. “We’re not here today to discuss the details of an alternative proposal,” Mahr said. “We are asking for a concrete commitment on infrastructure investment so we can return with multiple viable proposals for a publicly owned stadium in Chicago.”
Critics of the bill warn that diverting revenue to major developments could shortchange school districts and other local services. Brian Constin of Americans for Prosperity Illinois argued that the bill could shift a greater share of property taxes onto residents.
Further debate will continue when the full Illinois House returns on March 18. The outcome of this legislation could have significant implications for the future of the Chicago Bears and the economic landscape of the region.
According to WCIA…
